“Eman really knows his stuff and we were very pleased with our end result.”
Myretta & Thomas Knorr
✦ Board-Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law — State Bar of California ✦
Your employer cannot punish you for getting hurt. If they did, we’ll make them pay.
By Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law
Filing a workers' compensation claim in Glendale should be a straightforward exercise of your legal rights. In reality, many Glendale workers face retaliation from their employers the moment they report an injury or file a claim. The retaliation is rarely as obvious as an immediate termination. In Glendale's professional and corporate work environment, it tends to be subtle — reduced hours, unfavorable schedule changes, exclusion from projects, negative performance reviews that appeared out of nowhere, or a constructive termination where your working conditions become so intolerable that you are effectively forced to resign.
California law prohibits this conduct. Labor Code section 132a makes it a misdemeanor for an employer to discriminate against a worker because they filed or intend to file a workers' compensation claim. At Yazdchi Law P.C., board-certified specialist Eman Yazdchi pursues 132a claims aggressively, holding Glendale employers accountable for the full range of penalties the law provides.
Section 132a is one of the strongest worker protection provisions in California's Labor Code. It prohibits any employer from discharging, threatening to discharge, or discriminating in any manner against an employee because the employee has filed or made known their intention to file a workers' compensation claim, has received a rating or award, or has testified in another employee's case.
The remedies under 132a are substantial. A worker who proves retaliation is entitled to:
These remedies are pursued through the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, not the civil courts. For Glendale workers, this means the claim is heard at the Van Nuys WCAB.
Glendale's economy is built on professional services, healthcare, insurance, and retail. In these industries, retaliation often looks different than it does on a construction site or factory floor. Understanding the patterns is essential to recognizing when your rights are being violated.
Performance review manipulation. This is the most common retaliation tactic in Glendale's corporate and healthcare environments. An employee with consistently positive reviews files a workers' comp claim, and suddenly their next evaluation contains criticisms that were never raised before. The employer uses the manufactured paper trail to justify demotion or termination, claiming the action was based on "performance issues" rather than the workers' comp claim. We know how to expose this tactic by obtaining the full history of performance reviews and demonstrating the suspicious timing.
Schedule and duty changes. A nurse at Glendale Memorial Hospital files a workers' comp claim for a cumulative shoulder injury and is subsequently moved from a preferred day shift to night shifts, or reassigned from her specialty unit to a less desirable position. An office worker on Brand Boulevard returns from medical leave and finds their responsibilities have been redistributed with no explanation. These changes may constitute discrimination under 132a if they are motivated by the workers' comp claim.
Constructive termination. Rather than fire the worker outright, the employer makes the work environment so unpleasant or disadvantageous that the employee feels compelled to resign. In Glendale's professional settings, this might involve isolation from team activities, removal from important client accounts, elimination of advancement opportunities, or creating conditions that aggravate the worker's existing injury.
Contract non-renewal. Some Glendale employers use contract or at-will employment structures to mask retaliation. A worker whose contract has been renewed annually for five years suddenly has it not renewed shortly after filing a workers' comp claim. While employers have discretion in contract decisions, the timing can establish circumstantial evidence of discriminatory motive.
An accounts manager at a Glendale financial services firm develops carpal tunnel syndrome and files a workers' comp claim. Within two weeks, her supervisor begins documenting "tardiness" that was never an issue before and excludes her from a major client project she had been leading for months. Two months later, she is terminated for "performance deficiencies." We file a 132a petition, obtain the full personnel file, depose the supervisor, and demonstrate that the termination was pretextual — the real reason was the workers' comp claim.
A radiology technician at a Glendale medical imaging center files a claim for a cumulative back injury from years of positioning patients. After returning from a brief medical leave, he finds that his schedule has been changed from four ten-hour shifts to five eight-hour shifts, eliminating the three-day weekends that were part of his original employment terms. The employer claims the schedule change was "operational." We establish through discovery that no other employees in his department had their schedules changed and that the modification coincided precisely with his return from workers' comp leave.
A claims adjuster at a Glendale insurance company files a stress claim after months of unreasonable workload from a hostile supervisor. The employer places her on a "performance improvement plan" within days of receiving notice of the claim. The PIP is designed to be impossible to satisfy, setting the stage for termination. We file the 132a petition before the employer can execute the termination, putting them on notice that any further adverse action will compound their liability.
Retaliation claims require a lawyer who understands both workers' compensation procedure and employment law dynamics. The 132a proceeding is heard within the workers' comp system, but the evidence involves personnel records, supervisor testimony, and employment policies that cross into employment law territory. Eman Yazdchi's board certification in workers' compensation provides the procedural and legal foundation, and our firm's experience with professional and corporate workplace environments gives us insight into the subtle retaliation tactics that Glendale employers use.
We pursue 132a claims alongside the underlying workers' compensation case, ensuring that the retaliation creates additional liability for the employer rather than going unaddressed. The combination of a workers' comp claim and a 132a petition often motivates employers to resolve both matters favorably.
Injured at work in Glendale? Call (661) 273-1780
Tap to call →If your Glendale employer has retaliated against you for filing a workers' comp claim, you have legal options and you have leverage. Contact Yazdchi Law P.C. for a free consultation. We will evaluate the evidence of retaliation, explain the 132a process, and develop a strategy to hold your employer accountable. There is no fee unless we recover for you.
Ready to discuss your case? Schedule a free consultation.
Schedule Free ConsultationRead more testimonials →“Eman really knows his stuff and we were very pleased with our end result.”