“A fighting force both consistent and compassionate on a scale’s a 5 all around.”
Rachael Hall
✦ Board-Certified Specialist in Workers’ Compensation Law — State Bar of California ✦
Bad ruling? We take your case to the next level — Reconsideration, Writ of Review, and beyond.
By Eman Yazdchi, Esq. · Certified Specialist in Workers' Compensation Law
The workers' comp system does not always get it right the first time. A Canyon Country warehouse worker gets a permanent disability rating that ignores the reality of their injury. A construction worker's surgical request is denied through Utilization Review. A mechanic's entire claim is rejected on the basis of a defense medical report that spent fifteen minutes examining an injury that took years to develop. For Canyon Country's industrial workforce -- the people who work the warehouses on Sierra Highway, the construction sites along Soledad Canyon Road, and the auto shops and manufacturing plants across the SCV -- an unfavorable decision does not have to be the final word. The appeals process exists to correct errors, and a board-certified specialist knows how to use it.
The workers' compensation appeals process operates on multiple levels, and Canyon Country workers may need to pursue one or more depending on their situation.
Utilization Review appeals. When the insurance carrier denies a treatment request -- a spinal surgery, an MRI, physical therapy sessions -- through its Utilization Review process, the injured worker can request an Independent Medical Review under Labor Code Section 4610.5. The IMR is conducted by a physician reviewer who is independent of the insurer and who evaluates whether the requested treatment is medically necessary based on the MTUS (Medical Treatment Utilization Schedule) guidelines. If the IMR overturns the UR denial, the insurer must authorize treatment. IMR decisions are binding on the insurer, though they can be challenged by the injured worker if unfavorable.
Appeals of workers' comp judge decisions. After a trial at the Van Nuys WCAB, the workers' comp judge issues a Findings and Award or other order. If either party disagrees with the decision, they can file a Petition for Reconsideration with the WCAB Appeals Board within 20 days under Labor Code Section 5903. The reconsideration panel reviews the trial record and determines whether the judge's decision is supported by substantial evidence, whether errors of law occurred, or whether new evidence warrants a different outcome.
Appeals to the Court of Appeal. If reconsideration is denied or the reconsideration panel's decision is unfavorable, the injured worker can file a Writ of Review with the California Court of Appeal under Labor Code Section 5950. This is the highest level of appeal in the workers' comp system and is reserved for cases involving significant legal errors or constitutional issues.
Not every unfavorable decision warrants an appeal. The decision to appeal must be based on a realistic assessment of whether the evidence and the law support a different outcome. Canyon Country workers should strongly consider an appeal in the following situations.
The permanent disability rating is significantly lower than the medical evidence supports. Insurance carriers hire defense medical evaluators who routinely minimize impairment findings. A Canyon Country forklift operator with a lumbar fusion and permanent lifting restrictions should receive a substantial permanent disability rating. If the treating physician's or the Panel QME's impairment findings are significantly higher than the defense evaluator's, and the judge adopted the defense numbers, that decision may be ripe for reconsideration.
A treatment request was denied despite clear medical necessity. A Canyon Country construction worker with a documented disc herniation, failed conservative treatment, and a surgical recommendation from an orthopedic spine specialist should not have surgery denied. If Utilization Review denied the request and the IMR upheld the denial, the case may still be challenged through the WCAB if the IMR reviewer applied the wrong medical guidelines or failed to consider relevant evidence.
The claim was denied on causation grounds despite strong evidence of work-relatedness. If a Canyon Country mechanic's hand injury was denied because the insurer's doctor attributed it to non-work activities, but the treating physician and occupational history clearly link the injury to years of using pneumatic tools, the denial should be challenged through the adjudication process.
For Petitions for Reconsideration, the 20-day deadline from the date of service of the judge's decision is strictly enforced. Missing this deadline forfeits the right to appeal. The petition must identify specific legal or factual errors in the judge's decision and explain why a different outcome is warranted. The opposing party has an opportunity to file an answer, and the reconsideration panel issues a decision based on the written submissions and the trial record.
The reconsideration panel can grant reconsideration and issue a new decision, rescind the judge's decision and return the case for further proceedings, or deny reconsideration. The process typically takes several months from filing to decision.
Yazdchi Law evaluates every unfavorable decision for appeal potential before the 20-day deadline expires. The firm does not file frivolous appeals, but when the evidence supports a better outcome, Attorney Eman Yazdchi pursues the appeal with the same thoroughness applied to the original case.
Canyon Country's industrial workers face particular obstacles in the appeals process. Many injured workers represented themselves or used inexperienced attorneys at the trial level, resulting in a weak evidentiary record that makes appeal difficult. Key medical evidence may not have been developed, vocational evidence may be absent, and the trial testimony may not adequately describe the mechanism of injury or the functional limitations.
When Yazdchi Law takes over a case on appeal, the firm evaluates whether the existing record supports reconsideration or whether additional proceedings are needed to develop the evidence. In some cases, the most effective strategy is to seek a return of the case to the trial level for further development rather than arguing for a reversal based on an incomplete record.
Spanish-speaking workers from Canyon Country's warehouse and construction industries face the additional challenge of ensuring that their testimony at the trial level was accurately interpreted. Translation errors in medical reports and hearing testimony can materially affect the outcome. Yazdchi Law reviews the record for interpretation issues that may have prejudiced the original decision.
Injured at work in Canyon Country? Call (661) 273-1780
Tap to call →Appeals are the most technically demanding area of workers' comp practice. They require mastery of procedural rules, an understanding of the evidentiary standards the reconsideration panel applies, and the ability to identify reversible error in a judge's decision. Eman Yazdchi is a Board-Certified Workers' Compensation Specialist -- fewer than 1% of California attorneys hold this credential. For Canyon Country workers facing an unfair decision, that level of expertise is what the appeal process demands.
Ready to discuss your case? Schedule a free consultation.
Schedule Free ConsultationRead more testimonials →“A fighting force both consistent and compassionate on a scale’s a 5 all around.”